Task Objective:
Generate a set of 16 chat-style sticker emojis based on the reference images. The result should feel expressive, highly shareable, and stylistically unified — but intentionally chaotic, low-quality, and humorous.
The final output should look like:
Someone who cannot draw, using a mouse in MS Paint, randomly doodling and writing text at the same time — messy, awkward, low-effort, but unexpectedly funny.
————————
Input Structure:
Image 1: Character reference (may include one or multiple subjects such as people, pets, or combinations)
Image 2: Layout reference (only for understanding the 4x4 grid structure, not style)
User Inputs:
- Text content (multiple lines, any language, may be fewer or more than 16)
————————
Character Usage Rules:
- Identify all possible subjects in Image 1 (people, animals, etc.)
- Each subject can act as a main character
- Different stickers can feature different characters
- Some stickers may include multiple characters interacting
- Distribution should feel natural and context-driven
————————
Consistency Definition (Critical Redefinition):
This task prioritizes “consistent imperfection”, NOT realistic consistency.
The same character across stickers:
Does NOT need to look identical,
but must feel like it was drawn by the same unskilled person.
Must be consistent in:
- Drawing behavior (same clumsy hand)
- Simplification logic
- Error patterns (crooked proportions, shaky lines)
- Overall messiness level
Allowed:
- Facial distortion
- Proportion inconsistency
- Structural errors
- Missing details
Must retain:
- Minimal recognizable traits (e.g. silhouette, color, signature features)
Summary:
Consistency = “wrong in the same way”, not “accurate likeness”
————————
Layout & Structure:
- 16 stickers total, arranged in a 4x4 grid
- Each sticker is an independent frame
- Can feature single or multiple characters
- Individual frames can be messy
- Overall grid must remain clear and readable
————————
Text System (Core Expression Layer):
User provides multiple lines of text:
Quantity Handling:
- If fewer than 16 → automatically complete to 16
- If more than 16 → select the most expressive 16
Language Rule:
- Use the same language as the user input
- Do NOT enforce any specific language
Completion Rules:
- Maintain tone consistency (sarcastic, lazy, emotional, clingy, absurd, etc.)
- Prefer internet-style expressions
- Short phrases preferred, but longer lines allowed
- Avoid repetition
Expression Goals:
- Instantly understandable
- Emotionally strong
- Feels like real meme text
Tone Priority:
- Complaints
- Self-talk
- Emotional bursts
- Indifference / annoyance / absurd humor
Avoid:
- Polite responses
- Formal or structured phrasing
————————
Text-Image Integration (Critical):
Text must be DRAWN, not typeset.
Must:
- Look like mouse handwriting (crooked, shaky, uneven size)
- Be messy (tilted, overlapping, misaligned)
- Have inconsistent spacing
- Be placed freely (on face, beside, edges, etc.)
Allowed:
- Repeated letters (aaaaa)
- Stretched words (soooo tired)
- Random punctuation (????!!!)
- Messy or ugly writing
Must:
- Remain readable
- Not block understanding
————————
Expression Generation Mechanism (Most Important):
Simulate this process:
“A person who cannot draw, using a mouse, doodling randomly while writing text at the same time.”
Key Rules:
- Image and text must come from the SAME moment
- Not: draw first, then add text
- But: draw and write simultaneously
Each sticker should feel like:
- Random doodle
- Then spontaneous writing
- Or both happening together
Should feel:
- Unplanned
- Careless
- Immediate
————————
Text-Image Relationship:
Text and visuals should form:
- Commentary
- Emotional amplification
- Self-talk
- Or slightly mismatched humor
Allowed:
- Loose or imperfect alignment
- Absurd or off-topic humor
Goal:
Not accuracy, but humor
————————
Aesthetic DNA (Core Style Driver):
Style origin:
Terrible MS Paint doodles + failed imitation + extremely low drawing skill
Visual Traits:
Lines:
- Shaky, unstable, jagged
- Mouse-drawn look
Forms:
- Bad proportions
- Stick figures or crude shapes
- Distorted structures
Details:
- Minimal or none
- “Cannot draw” feeling
Texture:
- Pixelated
- Rough edges
Composition:
- Frames can be messy
- Grid must stay readable
Emotion:
- Awkward, direct, absurd, funny
Resemblance:
- Only vaguely resembles the original
- Like a failed copy
————————
Style Enforcement (Critical):
When conflict occurs:
Realism vs Style → ALWAYS choose Style
Allowed to break:
- Detail
- Proportion
- Accuracy
- Cleanliness
Strictly forbid:
- Clean lines
- Correct anatomy
- Polished visuals
- Designed aesthetics
Rule:
If it looks “good”, it is WRONG.
Force it back to messy, ugly, low-effort.
————————
Anti-Template & Randomization System (Critical):
Strictly forbid:
- Numbering (1, 2, 3…)
- List-style output
- Sequential planning
Must treat all 16 stickers as:
“16 independent, random expressions”
Randomness Requirements:
- Vary text length
- Vary tone and emotion
- Some complete, some fragmented
- Some minimal or almost empty
Avoid:
- Repetition
- Predictable phrasing
- Common default responses
Allow:
- Abrupt or weird expressions
- Uneven density
- Inconsistent structure
Generation Method:
Do NOT plan all 16.
Instead simulate:
“16 separate spontaneous moments”
Must include:
- Emotional fluctuation
- Instability
- Randomness
Anti-reuse rule:
Each generation must:
- Avoid repeating previous outputs
- Avoid fixed patterns
- Feel freshly created
————————
Sticker Requirements:
- Each sticker visually distinct
- Clear emotional signal
- Usable in chat
- Strong expressive power
————————
Final Goal:
Generate 16 stickers.
The result must feel like:
“A person who cannot draw used a mouse to doodle 16 times,
randomly writing emotional thoughts each time —
messy, inconsistent, but unexpectedly funny.”
NOT:
“A clean, well-designed AI sticker set”
